Top questions
Popular discussions about programming, compatibility and testing of optical transceivers.
The poster wanted a cheap 10G link between servers with Intel X520-DA2 NICs and an HP switch and worried that a direct-attach cable is coded either for Intel or for HP but not both. A respondent shared that two X520-DA2 cards would not link directly over a DAC in their case, but a Dell DAC…
On Aruba 2930F switches (JL255A) the poster installed new J9151E 10G SFP+ transceivers (part 1990-4727) that the transceiver guide lists as supported, but every unit was reported as Unsupported Transceiver (SelfTest Err#128000) and show tech transceivers showed ?? for type and serial. J9281D DACs…
An HP 5900AF-48XG-4QSFP+ (Comware 7.1.045 R2311P01) logged OPTMOD/4/PHONYMODULE: This is not a supported transceiver for this platform for two 10G SR SFP+ modules; display transceiver interface identified them as Avago and JDSU 10GBASESRSFP with DDM. The poster wanted to know which SFP+ to buy and…
4votes
2comments
258views
The poster connects a Cisco Catalyst C9300X-24Y to a FortiGate firewall with a 25G SFP-H25G-CU2M DAC. Whenever the DAC is inserted the switch logs '%PLATFORMPM-6-MODULEINSERTED: SFP module inserted with interface name Twe1/0/23' followed by '%PLATFORMPM-6-DIFFERENTMODULEINSERTED: Warning: SFP…
The poster tried to link an HPE FlexFabric 5900AF and a Dell S5212F-ON at 10 Gbps with DAC cables that had been custom-made with an HPE-coded end and a Dell-coded end. Both ports were forced to 10G full duplex, but no link came up. On the HPE side the interface reported Media type is stack wire…
Two service providers shared a fibre with CWDM multiplexers. The existing 1310 nm channel worked, but after adding a 1471 nm channel the transmitting side saw frames leave (confirmed with packet captures) while the far end received nothing, even though light levels looked normal. The provider had…
4votes
2 answers
242views
On an IOS XR router (RSP-based ASR 9000 class, observed on IOS XR 4.x and 5.x), the poster configured a tunable DWDM XFP with 'controller dwdm 0/1/0/0', 'admin-state maintenance', 'wavelength 55', 'admin-state in-service' and then brought the TenGigE interface up. The running configuration shows…
The poster compiled and loaded i40e 3.4.2 on Ubuntu 16.04 for an Intel XL710-QDA2 dual-port 40GbE adapter. The driver loaded fine, but as soon as non-Intel QSFP+ cables were attached dmesg reported "Rx/Tx is disabled on this device because an unsupported SFP+ module type was detected." and no link…
The poster was building a server that needed a 1 Gbps single-mode fibre uplink and wanted a PCIe card with two to four SFP cages so any optic could be used later. The core doubt: switches usually accept plain 1G SFP optics in SFP+ ports, but is the same true for 10GbE server NICs, or would the NIC…
2votes
2comments
158views
On an Arista 7050QX running EOS 4.14 the poster tried to use third-party QSFP+ DAC cables; the ports went to errdisable as unqualified transceivers. They patched the XcvrAgent.py agent under /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages to skip the manufacturer check, which cleared the errdisable state but left…
The thread starter wanted to reprogram GBIC and SFP module EEPROMs but found that guides were disappearing from forums. Questions covered which programmer to use, where to attach the I2C lines on the module, whether the module needs 5 V (GBIC) or 3.3 V (SFP), and how to treat the memory as a…
6votes
2 answers
194views
The poster asked whether a 10G SFP+ SR or LR optic in one switch can auto-negotiate down to 1G to link over fiber with a 1G SFP in another switch, and if not, how to attach a handful of 1G optical connections from a 1G switch to a 10G switch. They understood that Cisco SFP+ optics run only at 10G…
2votes
2 answers
130views
The poster spent a day and a half chasing an Intel 82599EB-based 10G SFP+ NIC that VMware ESXi 6 reported as down although the link LEDs were green on both ends of the fibre and the Cisco 8500 switch showed the port up/up. The cause turned out to be the Cisco SFP-10G-LRM module used throughout…
The poster asked whether anyone had used third-party optics in a Cisco Catalyst 9300 series switch running IOS XE Everest (16.x), and specifically whether the hidden global command 'service unsupported-transceiver', long used on older Catalyst platforms to accept non-Cisco SFPs, still functions on…
The thread starter had a set of Cisco EEPROM images (SX, LH, ZX types) but no CWDM images and wanted CWDM SFP modules to show up on Cisco switches as CWDM/WDM optics rather than being misidentified as SX or LX. Without a correct image the switch either reported the module as unsupported or forced…
For a deployment on Dell PowerEdge R630 and C4140 servers the poster had Intel X520-SR2 adapters (E10G42BFSR) fitted with the bundled Intel FTLX8571D3BCV-I3 10GBASE-SR SFP+ modules (850 nm, 300 m multimode). The uplink switch is a Huawei Quidway 9300 whose SFP+ ports carry 10GBASE-LR (1310 nm)…
The poster's Cisco Catalyst C9500-48Y4C switches (IOS XE 16.12.04 after an upgrade) refuse to work with a batch of genuine Cisco SFP-10G-SR modules (VID V03, serials AVD2231D3TE and AVD2231D3RW): 'show inventory' lists them as 'GE ZX' instead of 'SFP+ 10GBASE-SR' and the ports stay non-functional…
While rolling out single-mode fiber between Cisco CBS350-8MGP-2X switches (firmware 3.4.0.17) with SFP-10G-LR modules, the poster hit strange behaviour: the link only comes up if the duplex LC connector is split and the TX fiber is inserted first, then the RX fiber. Inserting the joined LC…
An operator asked how to use non-Intel SFP+ modules for 10G fibre on Intel adapters under Linux. The replies summarised the practical rules: for 82599/X520 class NICs the ixgbe module parameter allowunsupportedsfp must be set, and on dual-port cards it must be given per port…
4votes
2 answers
124views
The poster spent two days trying to bring up a single-mode fiber link between an older Arista switch and a Cisco Catalyst 3650 (IOS-XE 3.7.5) with Cisco GLC-LH-SMD (SFP-LH-SMD) optics; the path runs through five patch cords in the same building and had been tested by the cabling contractor. At…
The poster wanted to use a 40G QSFP+ to 4x10G SFP+ DAC breakout cable on a Cisco Catalyst 9500-32QC-E running IOS XE 17.6.4 (Bengaluru). The 'hw-module breakout' command is rejected; in global configuration only 'hw-module slot' and 'hw-module subslot' are offered. The switch is not running…
2votes
2comments
208views
The poster, a new owner of a Cisco Nexus 93180YC-EX running NX-OS 7.0(3)I4(7), cannot bring up any 25G link. ipolex SFP28 DAC cables are recognized ('type is SFP-H25GB-CU1M', 'name is OEM', 'part number is SFP-H25G-CU1M', 'nominal bitrate is 25500 MBit/sec', 'DOM is not supported') but the port…
An operator asked about the practical behaviour of Brocade equipment with third-party SFP/SFP+ optics. Experience shared on NANOG: Foundry-heritage platforms (FastIron, NetIron, ICX including ICX7750) generally bring up any MSA-coded module, but the optical-monitor (DDM) function may be unavailable…
3votes
2 answers
170views
The poster planned to install an Intel X520 adapter (Cisco PID N2XX-AIPCI01) into a Cisco UCS C240 server and use Cisco SFP-10G-SR or SFP-10G-LR transceivers, and asked whether the combination has compatibility problems. A later reader asked whether the Cisco SFP-H10GB-CU3M= twinax cable would work…
The poster bought eight J9150D 10G SR SFP+ transceivers for an Aruba 5406R zl2 chassis with a J9993A module. Every module lit the orange LED and logged Unsupported Transceiver. (SelftTest Err#098000), even though the compatibility documents list this combination and the chassis had already been…
The poster is searching for GPON or XGS-PON SFP ONT sticks with a built-in MAC that work in Cisco routers, since Cisco does not sell such modules. Previous attempts with third-party ONT sticks were largely unsuccessful even after enabling 'service unsupported-transceiver'. In a follow-up the poster…
The poster wanted to dump the EEPROM of a QSFP+ transceiver plugged into an Intel XL710-QDA1 and ideally read live DDM values such as received optical power, as they were used to doing with SFP modules on other adapters. With i40e 2.0.23 and firmware 5.05 0x800028a2 1.1568.0, ethtool -m eth0…
6votes
4comments
164views
The poster has a stack of two Cisco Catalyst 3850-48T switches, each fitted with a 2x1G/2x10G fiber uplink network module. Two 10G fiber links already run in slots 2/1/3 and 2/1/4. When a single-mode 1G SFP is inserted into 1G slot 2/1/1, the switch reports the module as unsupported and places the…
On Ubuntu 18.04 (kernel 5.4.0, ethtool 5.3, i40e 2.8.20-k) the poster used 25G XXV710-based NICs bought from FS.com (FS part XXV710AM2-F2, Intel XXV710 chipset). Link and error-free wire-speed traffic worked, but reading a transceiver's DMI data with sudo ethtool -m enp4s0f0 failed with "Cannot get…
The poster wanted to use a Finisar FCLF8521P2BTL 1000BASE-T copper SFP in an Intel X710-DA2 running NVM 7.1. Intel's X710/XXV710/XL710 Feature Support Matrix (rev. 3.4, Nov 2019, doc 332191-024) lists single-speed SFP 1GBASE-T transceivers with support limited to Finisar FCLF-8521-3, Kinnex A…
A Cisco Catalyst 3850-24XS with an SFP-10G-LR (1310 nm) connects over a single-mode cross-connect to a Tier-1 carrier's layer-2 DWDM equipment in the same data center. When the carrier shuts the circuit down, TenGigabitEthernet2/0/23 goes 'down, line protocol is down (notconnect)' yet 'show…
The poster could not find Cisco documentation describing how to set the frequency or ITU channel of a DWDM-SFP10G-C tunable 10G SFP+. A follow-up question asked whether a CPAK-100G-LR4 in a CRS-X 4-port 100GE LAN/OTN card could be tuned to a wavelength and connected directly to a ROADM of an…
In a NANOG discussion about vendor lock-in, an operator described two concrete failures. First, a third-party optic answered I2C reads too slowly; the switch vendor's polling code did not handle the timeout and crashed the linecard control plane, and the vendor refused to treat it as a bug because…
While staging an EX2300-48P and an EX2300-24P (both Junos 18.2R3-S5.3) with non-Juniper SFP+/SFP modules, the 48-port switch recognised the transceivers and created interfaces, but the 24-port switch showed nothing in any of its four uplink ports; show chassis hardware listed PIC 1 as 4x10G…
The poster wanted to verify whether an HPE StorageWorks 81B 8 Gb Fibre Channel HBA (AP769-60001) fitted with an AJ716B SFP could be used in an HPE ProLiant DL380 Gen10 server (P02464-B21) and asked for a tool where part numbers can be entered to get a compatibility verdict. No error had occurred…
3votes
3 answers
110views
The poster wanted to use third-party SFP modules in a Cisco Catalyst 2960L-48TS (LAN Lite feature set, image c2960l-universalk9-mz.152-6.E2b). Entering 'service unsupported-transceiver' in global configuration mode only produced a command error because the CLI does not know the command on this…
3votes
3comments
151views
The poster wanted to run a link bidirectionally over one strand of single-mode fiber on a Cisco Small Business 300 series switch. Cisco's SMB catalogue lists the MFEBX1 100 Mb BiDi SFP (transmitting at 1310 nm and receiving at 1550 nm), but the poster could not find a Cisco part number for the…
The poster, validating their product against Cisco Nexus 9000 switches (a Nexus C9332D-GX2B chassis), is blocked by bug CSCwo18785: configuring 200G on a QSFP-200G DAC fails with 'ERROR: The transceiver doesn't support this speed'. The cable is a Mellanox MCP1650-H002E26 200GbE DAC; connected…
The poster runs a Cisco Nexus 5000 with an N2K-C2232PP-10GE fabric extender. Three FEX-facing ports report 'sfp validation failed' with Cisco FET-10G modules. Following advice found online, the module was removed, the port speed set to 1000 and the module reinserted; the port was also shut/no shut…
The poster was connecting a Cisco Nexus 93180YC-FX to an Arista 7050SX3 with a 25G AOC sold as Cisco/Arista compatible. The Nexus detects the transceiver, but 'show interface status' reports the port as not connected. A 10G AOC from the same vendor works fine between the two switches, and the same…
Two Cisco Catalyst 3750-X switches (WS-C3750X-24P-L and WS-C3750X-48P-L) run identical code. A Cisco GLC-SX-MMD is detected normally in Gi1/1/1 of the first switch, but the second switch reports 'media type is Not Present' with 'link type is force-up' on Gi1/1/1, and 'show idprom interface Gi…
2votes
4comments
163views
The poster asked why third-party SFP modules stopped working after upgrading Cisco switches to IOS 15.2, whereas other vendors accept Cisco or other optics, and whether this is a technical limitation. No model, log output or interface details were given despite requests. In a later update the…
4votes
2 answers
100views
The poster connected a Dell server to a Cisco Catalyst C9500-48Y4C (IOS XE 17.9.3) using a Dell L56SF018-SD-R 3 m DAC (DAC-SFP-3M). The cable is not in Cisco's optics compatibility matrix, and 'show interface status' shows port TwentyFiveGigE1/0/35 as err-disabled. Logging shows…
The poster's newly acquired Cisco Catalyst 9300 (with an 8-port 10G SFP+ network module) would not link to a Cisco Catalyst 4503-E that only has 1G SFP ports. Suspecting a 10G-versus-1G speed mismatch, the poster tried to force the 9300's 10G SFP to operate at 1G with the 'speed' command, but the…
A Cisco Nexus 5672UP fitted with a 10GBASE-SR SFP+ could not connect to another switch that uses a 1000BASE-SX (1 Gbps) transceiver; both ends are multimode optics. When the poster changed the port speed, 'show interface brief' displayed an 'SFP checksum error', and swapping the Nexus optic for a 1…
The poster needs a 100GE link between a Cisco NCS55A2-MOD (NC55-MPA-4H-S MPA) and a Cisco Catalyst C9500-48Y4C using a QSFP-100G-CU1M DAC. Both platforms list the cable as supported, yet the link never comes up at the physical level. Because the Catalyst 9500 lacks 100G auto-negotiation (bug…
2votes
2comments
108views
The poster uses Ubiquiti (UBNT) SFP and SFP+ modules, both multimode and single-mode, in Cisco switches. They work perfectly in Catalyst 9300 and 3650 switches with current IOS, but in a Catalyst C1000 and a Catalyst 2960 the modules are detected on insertion yet reported as 'unknown' in 'show…
The poster wanted to run 100 Mbps fibre SFP modules in a D-Link DES-3200-28F but the vendor compatibility list only named older switches (DES-1228, DES-1252, DGS-3612G). The question was whether the list was simply stale or whether the modules would be rejected by the newer switch. A related…
2votes
2comments
170views
The poster (in a machine-translated post from the Spanish-language community) tried to connect two Cisco Business CBS350-24T-4X switches through their SFP+ ports using MikroTik XS+2733LC15D modules. No connectivity is established and the ports end up blocked by the switch's Link Flap Prevention…
Two Cisco Catalyst C1200-48T-4X switches were connected back-to-back with Cisco SFP-10G-LR modules in the ge49/te1 SFP+ slots. Both switches recognize the transceivers, the interfaces are administratively up, both ends transmit light and the DOM optical values are good, yet no link is established…