CodingBox Q&A Ask question

nethawk74

Egypt joined 10 months ago 5 questions 12 comments

ISP field engineer from Alexandria. Mostly Arista and Mellanox.

Questions

0votes
0comments
82views

Wedge100BF-32X on SONiC: 100G LR4 links back to back but not through the transport unless TX is patched first

We are handing a 100G circuit off to a core router through a leased optical transport system, and the port on our side refuses to come up. The same pair of modules links instantly on the bench, which is what makes this so irritating. Wedge100BF-32X (wedge100bf32x) running SONiC InnoLight…

2votes
1 answer
65views

Synology RS3614xs+ with an Intel X520-DA2: allow_unsupported_sfp ignored until set in the DSM-specific modules.conf keys

A Synology RS3614xs+ with a supported Intel X520-DA2 rejected the wrongly ordered SFP+ modules as unsupported. Putting options ixgbe allowunsupportedsfp=1 into /etc/modules.conf had no effcet, and even when the kernel log showed ixgbe: allowunsupportedsfp Enabled the driver still reported failed to…

4votes
3comments
62views

Napatech capture SmartNICs: what actually happens with an SFP+ that is not in the qualified list

We run packet capture on a handful of Napatech cards and I am putting together the optics order for the next rack. Before spending anything I want to understand what the qualified module list actually means in practice, because the wording leaves room for interpretation. Napatech NT40E3 and NT20E3…