CodingBox Q&A Ask question

Transceiver compatibility

Vendor locks, unsupported module errors, matching modules to switches, NICs and routers

52 questions
15 30 50 per page
0votes
0comments
190views

Fixing no carrier with Flypro 10GBASE-T SFP+ on a Dell-branded X520-DA2 under Debian and FreeBSD/OPNsense

A Dell-branded Intel X520-DA2 with Flypro 10GBASE-T SFP+ modules showed no carrier (or no interface at all) on Debian and on FreeBSD-based OPNsense because the card rejects unapproved modules. The post collects the per-OS fixes and the permanent EEPROM approach. Hardware involved: Dell-branded…

1vote
1 answer
63views

Non-Juniper SFP+/SFP modules not detected in any port of an EX2300-24P but fine in an EX2300-48P

While staging an EX2300-48P and an EX2300-24P (both Junos 18.2R3-S5.3) with non-Juniper SFP+/SFP modules, the 48-port switch recognised the transceivers and created interfaces, but the 24-port switch showed nothing in any of its four uplink ports; show chassis hardware listed PIC 1 as 4x10G…

3votes
2comments
250views

Which SFP+ modules to buy for EdgeSwitch 48 Lite uplinks and an Intel X710-DA2 server NIC

The poster planned a server with an Intel X710-DA2 dual-port SFP+ NIC connected to two Ubiquiti EdgeSwitch 48 Lite units, with LACP between the switches. Six 10G SFP+ modules were needed (two for the server side, four for the switches) and the question was which modules would be recognised by both…

4votes
1 answer
40views

CSCwo18785: 'ERROR: The transceiver doesn't support this speed' with a third-party 200G DAC on Nexus 9332D-GX2B

The poster, validating their product against Cisco Nexus 9000 switches (a Nexus C9332D-GX2B chassis), is blocked by bug CSCwo18785: configuring 200G on a QSFP-200G DAC fails with 'ERROR: The transceiver doesn't support this speed'. The cable is a Mellanox MCP1650-H002E26 200GbE DAC; connected…

2votes
1 answer
154views

CBS350 SFP-10G-LR link only comes up when the TX fiber is inserted before RX; faulty transceiver pair

While rolling out single-mode fiber between Cisco CBS350-8MGP-2X switches (firmware 3.4.0.17) with SFP-10G-LR modules, the poster hit strange behaviour: the link only comes up if the duplex LC connector is split and the TX fiber is inserted first, then the RX fiber. Inserting the joined LC…

4votes
2comments
258views

Catalyst C9300X-24Y resets FEC to auto when an SFP-H25G-CU2M DAC is inserted, breaking the link to a FortiGate

The poster connects a Cisco Catalyst C9300X-24Y to a FortiGate firewall with a 25G SFP-H25G-CU2M DAC. Whenever the DAC is inserted the switch logs '%PLATFORMPM-6-MODULEINSERTED: SFP module inserted with interface name Twe1/0/23' followed by '%PLATFORMPM-6-DIFFERENTMODULEINSERTED: Warning: SFP…

1vote
2comments
60views

Checking from 'show idprom' whether an old CISCO-FINISAR 1000BASE-LX SFP can be reused in a Catalyst 9300-M

Before replacing an old switch with a Cisco Catalyst 9300-M, the poster wanted to know whether the existing SFP could be reused and posted the 'show idprom interface gigabitEthernet 1/1/1' output: Vendor Name CISCO-FINISAR, Vendor Part Number FTLF1318P2BCL-C3, serial FNS15510U5B, 1310 nm, single…

2votes
1 answer
254views

Does 'service unsupported-transceiver' still work for third-party optics on Catalyst 9300 with IOS XE Everest?

The poster asked whether anyone had used third-party optics in a Cisco Catalyst 9300 series switch running IOS XE Everest (16.x), and specifically whether the hidden global command 'service unsupported-transceiver', long used on older Catalyst platforms to accept non-Cisco SFPs, still functions on…

6votes
4comments
164views

1G SFP in a Catalyst 3850 uplink module reported unsupported and err-disabled

The poster has a stack of two Cisco Catalyst 3850-48T switches, each fitted with a 2x1G/2x10G fiber uplink network module. Two 10G fiber links already run in slots 2/1/3 and 2/1/4. When a single-mode 1G SFP is inserted into 1G slot 2/1/1, the switch reports the module as unsupported and places the…