Top questions
Popular discussions about programming, compatibility and testing of optical transceivers.
2votes
2comments
111views
A UDM Pro (port 11 set to 1G) and a US-16-150W (port 17) connected by a 1 m Ubiquiti DAC (UDC-1) did not talk: the switch showed a link light, the UDM Pro showed nothing. Setting both sides to 1G and rebooting both devices did not help; reversing the cable and removing the parallel copper uplink…
The poster spent two days trying to bring up a single-mode fiber link between an older Arista switch and a Cisco Catalyst 3650 (IOS-XE 3.7.5) with Cisco GLC-LH-SMD (SFP-LH-SMD) optics; the path runs through five patch cords in the same building and had been tested by the cabling contractor. At…
A Dell R720 with the integrated i350/X520 daughter card ran Proxmox VE; Cisco-branded 10G multimode LC SFP+ modules that worked elsewhere were rejected as unsupported. Adding options ixgbe allowunsupportedsfp=1 to the module options had no visible effect. Respondents walked through GRUB kernel…
The poster wanted to use third-paty SFP modules in a Cisco Catalyst 2960L-48TS (LAN Lite feature set, image c2960l-universalk9-mz.152-6.E2b). Entering 'service unsupported-transceiver' in global configuration mode only produced a command error because the CLI does not know the command on this…
Adding a 100G link between two racks on an X690 that has been quietly doing 10G access work for a couple of years. The uplink cage will not take the speed at all. ExtremeSwitching X690-48x-2q-4c 1 m QSFP28 direct attach cable, Q28+CR41m port 57, one of the QSFP28 uplink cages The cable comes up as…
Users needed to write to password-protected SFP/QSFP/XFP modules from HP, Cisco, Finisar and JDSU. The thread documents the two protection levels: a host/user password protecting the user-writable area (A2h offset 7Bh on SFP, A0h offset 7Bh on QSFP/XFP) and a manufacturer password protecting the…
Intel X520 (82599) cards enforce a list of approved SFP+ modules; under Linux the ixgbe parameter helps, but on Windows or ESXi there is no such option. The gist provides a Python script that reads the card EEPROM with ethtool -e and sets bit 0 of the byte at offset 0x58 (0 = Intel modules only, 1…
3votes
4comments
170views
Running a CWDM ring at the access layer, Catalyst 3750 at aggregation. I got plain modules with no vendor encoding, case marking TTG965D1, 1470-1610 nm grid. The link comes up, traffic flows, but the switch treats them as SX modules: in both inventory and monitoring it shows SX instead of CWDM, so…
A Synology RS3614xs+ with a supported Intel X520-DA2 rejected the wrongly ordered SFP+ modules as unsupported. Putting options ixgbe allowunsupportedsfp=1 into /etc/modules.conf had no effcet, and even when the kernel log showed ixgbe: allowunsupportedsfp Enabled the driver still reported failed to…
A MikroTik CSS610-8G-2S+IN showed an active SFP+ link, but Intel X520-DA1/DA2 NICs (Windows, Linux, ESXi) reported no link, reproducibly across multiple transceiver pairs, DACs and two cards. Firmware 2.12, 2.13rc6, 2.13rc12, 2.13rc25 and the final 2.13 were tested. Hardware involved: MikroTik…
On a Protectli Vault 6 with Intel X710 SFP+ ports (ixl0/ixl1) a 1G EZConn ETB43315-7S34-FR SFP showed no carrier. Logs contained Invalid advertised speed; valid flags are: 0x06, ixl1setlink: Error getting phy capabilities -37, aq error: 8 and Link failed because an unqualified module was detected!…
A Linux server with an Intel 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ controller showed no 10G interface and dmesg contained failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ or QSFP module type was detected after an untested SFP+ module was inserted. The article explains that the ixgbe driver only enables modules it…
3votes
2comments
160views
I am specifying a fibre ring for a customer's plant network and the switch choice is already fixed: Moxa EDS-518A. The BOM went out with generic 1G optics, because our stock room is full of them, and now the customer's own engineer insists that only Moxa-branded modules may be fitted. switches…
2votes
2comments
144views
After UniFi Network 10.0.140 / switch firmware 7.2.123 several operators saw SFP+ ports (UI optics, UACC-OM-MM-10G-D, MikroTik XS+DA0001 DACs, UACC-CM-RJ45-MG copper modules) flapping on US-XG-16, USW Pro Max, UDM Pro and USW-24-Pro units, with STP State Flapping alerts, ports blocked, and switches…
The psoter planned to install an Intel X520 adapter (Cisco PID N2XX-AIPCI01) into a Cisco UCS C240 server and use Cisco SFP-10G-SR or SFP-10G-LR transceivers, and asked whether the combination has compatibility problems. A later reader asked whether the Cisco SFP-H10GB-CU3M= twinax cable would work…
On a Mellanox MSN4600C (ACS-MSN4600C) running SONiC in a T1 topology, the test testchcksfpusingethtool failed because ethtool -m sfp[ID] returned rc=1 with Cannot get module EEPROM information: No such device, i.e. the module EEPROM was not accessible on that platform during the test. Hardware…
On a Juniper EX4600 running Junos 14.1X53-D27.3 the poster inserted a non-certifiied 1G single-mode WDM (BiDi) SFP, 20 km, TX 1550 / RX 1310 nm with DDM, into ge-0/0/1. The interface never appeared: show interfaces returned error: device ge-0/0/1 not found, and the log recorded XCVR: Unit 1, Fibre…
While rolling out single-mode fiber between Cisco CBS350-8MGP-2X switches (firmware 3.4.0.17) with SFP-10G-LR modules, the poster hit strange behaviour: the link only comes up if the duplex LC connector is split and the TX fiber is inserted first, then the RX fiber. Inserting the joined LC…
A notes repository on hacking SFP/QSFP EEPROM: SFPs present EEPROM at I2C 0x50 and DOM plus vendor/password features at 0x51; locked moddules need a 4-byte password written to 0x51 bytes 0x7b-0x7e. It lists several known unlock passwords and evaluates write methods (off-the-shelf coder limited to…
After a power outage an Aruba Instant On 1930 (24 ports plus 4 SFP) still recognised inserted SFP modules but every SFP port stayed down; inserting a new transceiver made the port LED blink once and then nothing. The poster asked for diagnostics or replacement options. Hardware involved: Aruba…
The poster programmed an OEM copper SFP with a 256-byte firmware dump; the switch recognised the type but the module received no data, whereas the original worked, and no password error appeared. It failed on several units. Hardware involved: OEM copper SFP (24C02 EEPROM). Reported…
4votes
4comments
165views
Two Cisco Catalyst C1200-48T-4X switches were connected back-to-baack with Cisco SFP-10G-LR modules in the ge49/te1 SFP+ slots. Both switches recognize the transceivers, the interfaces are administratively up, both ends transmit light and the DOM optical values are good, yet no link is established…
On an Extreme Summit X670 two QSFP+ ports were configured as 4x10G, the ports were set to 10000 full duplex with auto off and VLANs assigned, but a breakout cable with an MPO connector to six LC connectors produced no link on the QSFP+ sie or on the SFP+ side. Hardware involved: Extreme Summit…
On a Minisforum MS-01 running Proxmox (i40e, kernel 6.8.12-10-pve) the X710 SFP+ port enp2s0f0np0 recogniesd a Ubiquiti SFP+-to-RJ45 module (ethtool listed 10G Base-SR capability) but the link never came up: Link detected: no, interface DOWN, no dmesg errors, ip link set up made no difference…
I look after a small pool of FreeBSD boxes and I am adding 10G to one of them. The card went in, the machine boots fine, but the OS refuses to make an interface out of it. Server on FreeBSD 12.1-RELEASE-p1, stock GENERIC kernel QLogic FastLinQ QL41112 dual-port 10GbE SFP+ adapter SFP+ optics in…
3votes
2comments
145views
On Aruba 2930F switches (JL255A) the poster installed new J9151E 10G SFP+ transceivers (part 1990-4727) that the transceiver guide lists as supported, but every unit was reported as Unsupported Transceiver (SelfTest Err#128000) and show tech transceivers showed ?? for type and serial. J9281D DACs…
The poster's Cisco Catalyst C9500-48Y4C switches (IOS XE 16.12.04 after an upgrade) refuse to work with a batch of genuine Cisco SFP-10G-SR modules (VID V03, serials AVD2231D3TE and AVD2231D3RW): 'show inventory' lists them as 'GE ZX' instead of 'SFP+ 10GBASE-SR' and the ports stay non-functional…
The poster wanted to run 100 Mbps fibre SFP modules in a D-Link DES-3200-28F but the vendor compatibility list only named older switches (DES-1228, DES-1252, DGS-3612G). The question was whether the list was simply stale or whether the modules would be rejected by the newer switch. A related…
4votes
2comments
314views
The poster connects a Cisco Catalyst C9300X-24Y to a FortiGate firewall with a 25G SFP-H25G-CU2M DAC. Whenever the DAC is inserted the switch logs '%PLATFORMPM-6-MODULEINSERTED: SFP module inserted with interface name Twe1/0/23' followed by '%PLATFORMPM-6-DIFFERENTMODULEINSERTED: Warning: SFP…
3votes
2comments
269views
The poster planned a server with an Intel X710-DA2 dual-port SFP+ NIC connected to two Ubiquiti EdgeSwitch 48 Lite units, with LACP between the switches. Six 10G SFP+ modules were needed (two for the server side, four for the switches) and the question was which modules would be recognised by both…