CodingBox Q&A Ask question

Top questions

Popular discussions about programming, compatibility and testing of optical transceivers.

354 questions
15 30 50 per page
0votes
1 answer
83views

RB4011 SFP+ port does not link with a passive S+DA0001 DAC: only active cables (S+AO0005) are supported

A MikroTik RB4011 connected with an S+DA0001 DAC to a CRS106-1C-5S and a CRS112-8G-IN (all default configuration apart from IP addresses) had no connectivity over the SFP link. The RB4011 SFP+ cage is documented to accept onyl active direct-attach cables, so a passive twinax between it and the two…

1vote
1 answer
96views

Real incidents caused by third-party optics: slow I2C crashing a linecard and a DDM uptime overflow bug

In a NANOG discussion about vendor lock-in, an operator described two concrete failures. First, a third-party optic answered I2C reads too slowly; the switch vendor's polling code did not handle the timeout and crashed the linecard control plane, and the vendor refused to treat it as a bug because…

1vote
1 answer
117views

Non-Juniper SFP+/SFP modules not detected in any port of an EX2300-24P but fine in an EX2300-48P

While staging an EX2300-48P and an EX2300-24P (both Junos 18.2R3-S5.3) with non-Juniper SFP+/SFP moules, the 48-port switch recognised the transceivers and created interfaces, but the 24-port switch showed nothing in any of its four uplink ports; show chassis hardware listed PIC 1 as 4x10G SFP/SFP+…

0votes
1 answer
142views

CRS312 to UniFi USW-Pro-48 could only link at 1G after a RouterOS upgrade; the RouterBOARD firmware had not been updated

A MikroTik CRS312-4C+8XG (RouterOS 7.13.4) and a Ubiquiti USW-Pro-48 (6.6.61) over 20 m OM3 with SR 850 nm SFP+ optics would only negotiate 1G full duplex; 10G attempts failed with no link and occasional Rx Fault on the UniFi side. Several fibre and transceiver combinations were tested and RouterOS…

1vote
1 answer
59views

i40e refuses to load with Fiberxon 10G SFP+ on X710: no allow-unsupported-SFP option

The poster's Intel Ethernet Converged Network Adapter X710 would not come up with third-party Fiberxon 10G SFP+ modules: the i40e driver, version 1.2.48, refused to initialise and reported "The driver failed to load because unsupported module type was detected." They asked how to switch on an…

2votes
2comments
204views

Arista 7050QX puts ports with unqualified third-party QSFP+ DACs into errdisable

On an Arista 7050QX running EOS 4.14 the poster tried to use third-party QSFP+ DAC cables; the ports went to errdisable as unqualified transceivers. They patched the XcvrAgent.py agent under /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages to skip the manufacturer check, which cleared the errdisable state but left…

0votes
1 answer
117views

Eight new J9150D transceivers fail with Unsupported Transceiver (SelftTest Err#098000) on a 5406R zl2: all counterfeit

The poster bought eight J9150D 10G SR SFP+ transceivers for an Aruba 5406R zl2 chassis with a J9993A module. Every module lit the orange LED and logged Unsupported Transceiver. (SelftTest Err#098000), even though the compatibility documents list this combination and the chassis had already been…