CodingBox Q&A Ask question

All questions

Latest questions from the community.

354 questions
15 30 50 per page
6votes
1 answer
218views

Intel X520 in an R630 rejects a 10GBASE-T copper SFP+ with comp_codes_10g=0x00 despite allow_unsupported_sfp=1

We are consolidating a pair of R630s onto 10G and the cabling to the top of the rack is copper, so instead of pulling fibre I put 10GBASE-T SFP+ modules into the X520 cards. The switch end takes them without a word. The servers refuse to. Dell PowerEdge R630, Intel X520 (82599), dual port FS…

3votes
1 answer
106views

Brocade G720 keeps every 64G SFP-DD port in Module_Invalid with the DD PoD licence applied

We inherited a pair of Connectrix DS-7720B (Brocade G720) for a new fabric, and I haven't got anywhere near zoning yet, because not one of the double density ports will come up. Every single one of them says the same thing in switchshow: What is in the rack: Connectrix DS-7720B / Brocade G720…

7votes
7comments
390views

Scripting DDM polling over I2C: which A2h bytes hold the live values and which the thresholds

I am writing a small poller that pulls temperature, voltage, bias and optical power straight off the modules on our whitebox boxes, so we get a trend line instead of someone eyeballing a link after it has already started erroring. The NOS prints pretty values, but I want the raw numbers with the…

3votes
2comments
145views

Genuine Aruba J9151E SFP+ shows Unsupported Transceiver (SelfTest Err#128000) on 2930F switches

On Aruba 2930F switches (JL255A) the poster installed new J9151E 10G SFP+ transceivers (part 1990-4727) that the transceiver guide lists as supported, but every unit was reported as Unsupported Transceiver (SelfTest Err#128000) and show tech transceivers showed ?? for type and serial. J9281D DACs…

0votes
1 answer
132views

CWDM link: 1310 nm channel works, new 1471 nm channel carries no traffic despite good light levels

Two service providers shared a fibre with CWDM multiplexers. The existing 1310 nm channel worked, but after adding a 1471 nm channel the transmitting side saw frames leave (confirmed with packet captures) while the far end received nothing, even though light levels looked normal. The provider had…

0votes
1 answer
117views

Eight new J9150D transceivers fail with Unsupported Transceiver (SelftTest Err#098000) on a 5406R zl2: all counterfeit

The poster bought eight J9150D 10G SR SFP+ transceivers for an Aruba 5406R zl2 chassis with a J9993A module. Every module lit the orange LED and logged Unsupported Transceiver. (SelftTest Err#098000), even though the compatibility documents list this combination and the chassis had already been…

2votes
2comments
204views

Arista 7050QX puts ports with unqualified third-party QSFP+ DACs into errdisable

On an Arista 7050QX running EOS 4.14 the poster tried to use third-party QSFP+ DAC cables; the ports went to errdisable as unqualified transceivers. They patched the XcvrAgent.py agent under /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages to skip the manufacturer check, which cleared the errdisable state but left…

1vote
1 answer
96views

Real incidents caused by third-party optics: slow I2C crashing a linecard and a DDM uptime overflow bug

In a NANOG discussion about vendor lock-in, an operator described two concrete failures. First, a third-party optic answered I2C reads too slowly; the switch vendor's polling code did not handle the timeout and crashed the linecard control plane, and the vendor refused to treat it as a bug because…

1vote
1 answer
117views

Non-Juniper SFP+/SFP modules not detected in any port of an EX2300-24P but fine in an EX2300-48P

While staging an EX2300-48P and an EX2300-24P (both Junos 18.2R3-S5.3) with non-Juniper SFP+/SFP moules, the 48-port switch recognised the transceivers and created interfaces, but the 24-port switch showed nothing in any of its four uplink ports; show chassis hardware listed PIC 1 as 4x10G SFP/SFP+…