CodingBox Q&A Ask question

All questions

Latest questions from the community.

355 questions
15 30 50 per page
3votes
1 answer
155views

Where to set hw.ix.unsupported_sfp=1 on a Netgate XG-7100 with third-party optics (loader.conf.local vs GUI tunables)

The poster had third-party SFP+ optics for both the on-board Intel X553 ports of a Netgate XG-7100 and an add-in X520-DA2 and had found that hw.ixgbe.unsupportedsfp=1 in /boot/loader.conf enables them. Questions: does it apply to both on-board and PCIe Intel ports, what is the difference between…

5votes
5comments
223views

ConnectX-7 400G OSFP to a QSFP-DD switch port: is a passive DAC enough, or do the lane rates get in the way

Bringing up a pair of GPU boxes against our existing 400G fabric, and I have already managed to buy the wrong cable once, so I would rather get the theory straight before ordering again. NIC: ConnectX-7 MCX715105AS-WEAT, single 400G port, OSFP cage Switch: 400G QSFP-DD ports In hand: a passive 400G…

Indonesia sfpeng49 ID asked
1vote
1 answer
172views

VyOS on Supermicro SYS-1019D with Intel X722: i40e has no allow_unsupported_sfp, third-party SFP+ rejected

On a Supermicro SYS-1019D-FRN8TP running VyOS 1.4 rolling the on-board Intel X722 (i40e) did not recognise an ISP-supplied 1310/1270 nm single-fibre SFP nor other spare optics; ethtool -m returned Cannot get module EEPROM information: Invalid argument. The poster asked how to apply the well-known…

5votes
1 answer
211views

Brocade 200e between Proxmox and FreeNAS: Buffer I/O error and isp0: Receive Error while all ports show online

Running a small virtualization setup: two Proxmox 6 nodes and a target on FreeNAS 11.2. While the HBAs were connected to the target directly, everything ran for months without a single error. Put a used Brocade 200e between them to avoid crossing cables, and that's when it started. two Proxmox 6…

2votes
1 answer
106views

1G SFP on Intel X710 (pfSense, ixl) fails with unqualified module until the optic is recoded as Intel

On a Protectli Vault 6 with Intel X710 SFP+ ports (ixl0/ixl1) a 1G EZConn ETB43315-7S34-FR SFP showed no carrier. Logs contained Invalid advertised speed; valid flags are: 0x06, ixl1setlink: Error getting phy capabilities -37, aq error: 8 and Link failed because an unqualified module was detected!…

1vote
1 answer
310views

XCP-ng with X520-DA2 and Finisar SFP+: allow_unsupported_sfp must be set per port on the kernel command line

An XCP-ng host with an Intel X520-DA2 and Finisar SFP+ transceivers logged failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ or QSFP module type was detected. insmod with allowunsupportedsfp=1 failed with Unknown symbol in module; options ixgbe allowunsupportedsfp=1 in /etc/modprobe.d/ixgbe-options.conf…