CodingBox Q&A Ask question

Top questions

Popular discussions about programming, compatibility and testing of optical transceivers.

355 questions
15 30 50 per page
2votes
2comments
111views

UDM Pro to US-16-150W over a 1 m Ubiquiti DAC: link light on the switch only, even with both ports forced to 1G

A UDM Pro (port 11 set to 1G) and a US-16-150W (port 17) connected by a 1 m Ubiquiti DAC (UDC-1) did not talk: the switch showed a link light, the UDM Pro showed nothing. Setting both sides to 1G and rebooting both devices did not help; reversing the cable and removing the parallel copper uplink…

2votes
1 answer
319views

Proxmox on a Dell R720 with X520 rNDC: ixgbe allow_unsupported_sfp=1 does not take effect for Cisco SR modules

A Dell R720 with the integrated i350/X520 daughter card ran Proxmox VE; Cisco-branded 10G multimode LC SFP+ modules that worked elsewhere were rejected as unsupported. Adding options ixgbe allowunsupportedsfp=1 to the module options had no visible effect. Respondents walked through GRUB kernel…

0votes
1 answer
54views

Writing to password-protected SFP/QSFP/XFP: where the password lives and how brute force works

Users needed to write to password-protected SFP/QSFP/XFP modules from HP, Cisco, Finisar and JDSU. The thread documents the two protection levels: a host/user password protecting the user-writable area (A2h offset 7Bh on SFP, A0h offset 7Bh on QSFP/XFP) and a manufacturer password protecting the…

2votes
1 answer
86views

Synology RS3614xs+ with an Intel X520-DA2: allow_unsupported_sfp ignored until set in the DSM-specific modules.conf keys

A Synology RS3614xs+ with a supported Intel X520-DA2 rejected the wrongly ordered SFP+ modules as unsupported. Putting options ixgbe allowunsupportedsfp=1 into /etc/modules.conf had no effcet, and even when the kernel log showed ixgbe: allowunsupportedsfp Enabled the driver still reported failed to…

1vote
1 answer
128views

CSS610-8G-2S+IN shows link on SFP+ ports but Intel X520 NICs never see it; SwOS 2.13rc12 works, later builds do not

A MikroTik CSS610-8G-2S+IN showed an active SFP+ link, but Intel X520-DA1/DA2 NICs (Windows, Linux, ESXi) reported no link, reproducibly across multiple transceiver pairs, DACs and two cards. Firmware 2.12, 2.13rc6, 2.13rc12, 2.13rc25 and the final 2.13 were tested. Hardware involved: MikroTik…

2votes
1 answer
106views

1G SFP on Intel X710 (pfSense, ixl) fails with unqualified module until the optic is recoded as Intel

On a Protectli Vault 6 with Intel X710 SFP+ ports (ixl0/ixl1) a 1G EZConn ETB43315-7S34-FR SFP showed no carrier. Logs contained Invalid advertised speed; valid flags are: 0x06, ixl1setlink: Error getting phy capabilities -37, aq error: 8 and Link failed because an unqualified module was detected!…

2votes
1 answer
263views

Missing 10G interface on Intel 82599/X520: enabling allow_unsupported_sfp persistently on CentOS and Ubuntu

A Linux server with an Intel 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ controller showed no 10G interface and dmesg contained failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ or QSFP module type was detected after an untested SFP+ module was inserted. The article explains that the ixgbe driver only enables modules it…

2votes
2comments
144views

UniFi switches on firmware 7.2.123: SFP+ optics and DACs flap, STP flapping alerts, ports need reboot or forced 1G

After UniFi Network 10.0.140 / switch firmware 7.2.123 several operators saw SFP+ ports (UI optics, UACC-OM-MM-10G-D, MikroTik XS+DA0001 DACs, UACC-CM-RJ45-MG copper modules) flapping on US-XG-16, USW Pro Max, UDM Pro and USW-24-Pro units, with STP State Flapping alerts, ports blocked, and switches…