CodingBox Q&A Ask question

rx_admin25

Spain joined 4 months ago 5 questions

Datacenter technician from Valencia. Mostly ISP backbone.

Questions

1vote
1 answer
76views

Proxmox VE 6: X520-DA2 fails to load because an unsupported SFP+ or QSFP module type was detected

On Proxmox VE 6.0 (kernel 5.0.18-1-pve, ixgbe 5.1.0-k) an Intel X520-DA2 exposed ens1f0/ens1f1 but any inserted third-party SFP+ module produced failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ or QSFP module type was detected, and the driver had to be reloaded to detect module changes at all. Hardware…

3votes
2 answers
132views

Enabling third-party SFPs on an Aruba 2530-48G-2SFP+: allow-unsupported-transceiver from 16.02.0013

An Aruba/HPE 2530-48G-2SFP+ on firmware 16.01.0012 logged Port contains a transceiver not made by Hewlett Packard Enterprise with the advice to use only genuine transceivers, and refused the modules; ironically one of the rejected transceivers was HP-branded. The poster asked whether a command…

1vote
1 answer
55views

Real incidents caused by third-party optics: slow I2C crashing a linecard and a DDM uptime overflow bug

In a NANOG discussion about vendor lock-in, an operator described two concrete failures. First, a third-party optic answered I2C reads too slowly; the switch vendor's polling code did not handle the timeout and crashed the linecard control plane, and the vendor refused to treat it as a bug because…