CodingBox Q&A Ask question

Suppliers and vendors

Experience with suppliers, third-party modules, warranty and pricing

19 questions
15 30 50 per page
1vote
1 answer
96views

Real incidents caused by third-party optics: slow I2C crashing a linecard and a DDM uptime overflow bug

In a NANOG discussion about vendor lock-in, an operator described two concrete failures. First, a third-party optic answered I2C reads too slowly; the switch vendor's polling code did not handle the timeout and crashed the linecard control plane, and the vendor refused to treat it as a bug because…

1vote
1 answer
117views

Non-Juniper SFP+/SFP modules not detected in any port of an EX2300-24P but fine in an EX2300-48P

While staging an EX2300-48P and an EX2300-24P (both Junos 18.2R3-S5.3) with non-Juniper SFP+/SFP moules, the 48-port switch recognised the transceivers and created interfaces, but the 24-port switch showed nothing in any of its four uplink ports; show chassis hardware listed PIC 1 as 4x10G SFP/SFP+…

4votes
1 answer
102views

CSCwo18785: 'ERROR: The transceiver doesn't support this speed' with a third-party 200G DAC on Nexus 9332D-GX2B

The poster, validating their product against Cisco Nexus 9000 switches (a Nexus C9332D-GX2B chassis), is blocked by bug CSCwo18785: configuring 200G on a QSFP-200G DAC fails with 'ERROR: The transceiver doesn't support this speed'. The cable is a Mellanox MCP1650-H002E26 200GbE DAC; connected…

2votes
1 answer
310views

Does 'service unsupported-transceiver' still work for third-party optics on Catalyst 9300 with IOS XE Everest?

The poster asked whether anyone had used third-party optcis in a Cisco Catalyst 9300 series switch running IOS XE Everest (16.x), and specifically whether the hidden global command 'service unsupported-transceiver', long used on older Catalyst platforms to accept non-Cisco SFPs, still functions on…